Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Religitard
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. A11'd - WilyD 08:51, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
- Religitard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced WP:NEO, or WP:DICTIONARY. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 00:06, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as WP:A11 and WP:G10. --Nat Gertler (talk) 00:51, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
- delete I cannot endorse the speedy as I did find enough references to see that this is not a recent coinage. But there seems to be nothing more to say than that it is a slur, so I'm seeing WP:DICTIONARY as grounds for deletion. Mangoe (talk) 01:18, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete - I 100% agree with NatGertler - It's nothing but made up / an attack. –Davey2010 • (talk) 02:46, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete. Per NatGertler. Philg88 ♦talk 05:35, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.